Sabellianism vs Arianism in Religion - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 2, 2025

Arianism is an early Christian heresy that denied the full divinity of Jesus Christ, teaching that He was created by God the Father and therefore distinct from Him. This theological doctrine sparked intense debates in the 4th century, leading to the formulation of the Nicene Creed to affirm the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father. Discover how Arianism shaped early Christian theology and influenced religious history by reading the rest of this article.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Arianism Sabellianism
Core Belief Jesus Christ is a created being, not co-eternal with God the Father. God is a single person who manifests in three modes: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
View on Trinity Rejects co-equality and co-eternity of the Trinity. Denies distinct persons in the Trinity; stresses modalism.
Christology Jesus is subordinate to the Father; the highest created being. Jesus is the Father in a different mode; no real distinction.
Historical Period 3rd to 4th century, prominent in early Christian debates. 3rd century, early Christian theological position.
Key Proponents Arius, Bishop of Alexandria. Sabellius, early Christian theologian.
Orthodox Response Declared heretical at the Council of Nicaea (325 AD). Rejected as modalistic heresy by mainstream Christianity.

Introduction to Arianism and Sabellianism

Arianism is a theological doctrine asserting that Jesus Christ is the Son of God but distinct and subordinate to God the Father, emphasizing a hierarchical relationship within the Trinity. Sabellianism, also known as modalism, teaches that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not distinct persons but rather different modes or aspects of one God. Both Arianism and Sabellianism emerged in early Christian debates on the nature of the Godhead, challenging orthodox Trinitarian doctrine.

Historical Background of Each Doctrine

Arianism originated in the early 4th century, founded by Arius, a Christian presbyter from Alexandria, emphasizing the created and subordinate nature of the Son to the Father, which sparked significant theological conflict within the early Church. Sabellianism, also known as Modalism, emerged in the 3rd century, attributed to Sabellius, proposing that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are different modes or aspects of one God rather than distinct persons. Both doctrines played pivotal roles in shaping early Christian debates on the nature of the Trinity, leading to the development of orthodox Trinitarian doctrine at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD.

Key Beliefs of Arianism

Arianism centers on the belief that Jesus Christ is a created being, distinct and subordinate to God the Father, emphasizing the Son's beginning in time and denying the co-eternity and consubstantiality of the Son with the Father. This doctrine asserts that the Son is the first and greatest creation but not equal in nature or essence to God, contrasting with the orthodox Trinitarian view. Arianism fundamentally rejects the notion of the Trinity as three co-equal persons, shaping early Christological debates in the 4th century.

Core Tenets of Sabellianism

Sabellianism, a form of modalism, asserts that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not distinct persons but rather different modes or aspects of a single divine person. This belief contrasts sharply with Arianism, which posits a hierarchical relationship within the Trinity, emphasizing the Son as a created being subordinate to the Father. Sabellianism emphasizes the unity and indivisibility of God, rejecting the concept of three coexisting, distinct persons within the Godhead.

The Nature of the Trinity: Contrasting Views

Arianism posits that the Son is a created being, distinct and subordinate to the Father, denying co-eternity within the Trinity, whereas Sabellianism advocates for Modalism, asserting that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are different modes or aspects of one God rather than distinct persons. The key theological divergence lies in Arianism's emphasis on hierarchical ontology versus Sabellianism's denial of personal distinction within the Godhead. This contrast highlights foundational debates in early Christian doctrine regarding the unity and diversity within the Trinity.

Christology: The Divinity and Humanity of Jesus

Arianism asserts that Jesus Christ is a created being, subordinate to God the Father and not co-eternal, emphasizing His humanity over divinity. Sabellianism, also called Modalism, denies the distinct persons of the Trinity, teaching that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are modes of one God, thus emphasizing Christ's divinity but merging His identity with the Father. Both heresies contrast with orthodox Christology, which upholds Jesus as fully divine and fully human, co-eternal with the Father and distinct in personhood.

Scriptural Interpretations and Debates

Arianism interprets Scripture by emphasizing the created and subordinate nature of the Son, citing verses like John 14:28 ("the Father is greater than I") to argue against the Son's co-eternity and consubstantiality with the Father. Sabellianism, or Modalism, reads these same passages as illustrating different modes or manifestations of one God rather than distinct persons, upholding strict monotheism without hierarchy. Key biblical debates hinge on texts such as John 1:1 and Colossians 2:9, where Arianism denies the full deity of Christ while Sabellianism rejects Trinitarian distinctions, resulting in fundamentally divergent theological interpretations.

Major Proponents and Opponents

Arianism, championed by Arius, a 4th-century Alexandrian presbyter, argued that Christ was a created being distinct from God the Father, with opponents including Athanasius of Alexandria who upheld the Nicene Creed affirming Christ's consubstantiality with the Father. Sabellianism, advocated by Sabellius, promoted a modalistic understanding of the Trinity, asserting that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are different modes of one God rather than distinct persons, facing strong opposition from early Church Fathers such as Tertullian and Hippolytus who defended the orthodox doctrine of the Trinity. Both heresies shaped early Christian theological debates and were decisively countered by the formulations of the First Council of Nicaea and the development of Trinitarian doctrine.

Impact on Early Christian Councils

Arianism significantly influenced early Christian councils by prompting the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD to affirm the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father, effectively rejecting Arian doctrine as heresy. Sabellianism, a modalistic interpretation of the Trinity, challenged orthodox Trinitarian doctrine by denying distinct persons within the Godhead, leading to its condemnation at the Council of Constantinople in 381 AD. Both heresies shaped the development of creedal formulations that defined orthodox Christian theology on the nature of Christ and the Trinity.

Lasting Legacy and Influence on Modern Theology

Arianism fundamentally shaped early Christian debates on Christ's divinity by affirming the distinctiveness and subordination of the Son to the Father, influencing the development of the Nicene Creed and subsequent Trinitarian orthodoxy. Sabellianism, or Modalism, proposed the unity of God manifested in different modes rather than distinct persons, challenging theological frameworks and prompting clearer doctrinal definitions about the Trinity. Both heresies left a lasting legacy that forced the Church to articulate precise doctrines on the nature of Christ and the Trinity, impacting modern theological discussions on Christology and divine personhood.

Arianism Infographic

Sabellianism vs Arianism in Religion - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Arianism are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet