Felsic Dyke vs Ultramafic Dyke in Geography - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 2, 2025

Ultramafic dykes are geological formations composed primarily of dark, dense, magnesium-rich minerals such as olivine and pyroxene. These igneous intrusions cut through surrounding rock layers, often indicating significant tectonic and magmatic activity in the region. Explore the article to uncover how these structures influence mineral deposits and geological evolution.

Table of Comparison

Feature Ultramafic Dyke Felsic Dyke
Composition High in magnesium and iron; low silica content Rich in silica; high in quartz and feldspar
Color Dark green to black Light-colored, typically white, pink, or gray
Mineralogy Olivine, pyroxene, chromite Quartz, feldspar, mica
Viscosity Low viscosity magma High viscosity magma
Formation From mantle-derived mafic magma From crustal or differentiated magma
Common Locations Tectonic settings with mantle upwelling Continental crust areas, plutonic regions
Geological Significance Indicates mantle processes and ultramafic intrusions Associated with granitic intrusions and crustal melting

Introduction to Dykes: Definition and Significance

Ultramafic dykes are intrusive igneous features composed predominantly of mafic minerals such as olivine and pyroxene, indicating mantle-derived magmatic sources, while felsic dykes consist mainly of silica-rich minerals like quartz and feldspar from crustal melting processes. These vertical or steeply inclined sheet-like bodies cut through surrounding rock formations, providing critical evidence for understanding tectonic settings, magma evolution, and crustal differentiation. Their mineralogical composition and textural characteristics make ultramafic and felsic dykes valuable in reconstructing geological histories and assessing mineral exploration potential.

Ultramafic Dykes: Key Characteristics

Ultramafic dykes are characterized by their high magnesium and iron content, with low silica levels, distinguishing them from felsic dykes which contain higher silica and lighter minerals such as quartz and feldspar. These dykes typically exhibit a dark color and coarse-grained texture due to abundant olivine, pyroxene, and amphibole minerals. Ultramafic dykes often form from mantle-derived magmas, indicating deep tectonic processes and are important indicators in petrological studies for understanding mantle composition and magmatic differentiation.

Felsic Dykes: Key Characteristics

Felsic dykes are characterized by high silica content, typically exceeding 65%, and are composed primarily of quartz, feldspar, and mica minerals. These dykes exhibit light coloration, ranging from white to pink or light gray, contrasting sharply with the dark, magnesium- and iron-rich mineralogy of ultramafic dykes. Felsic dykes commonly form from magmas with high viscosity and erupt as intrusive bodies that cut across pre-existing rock formations, often associated with continental crustal environments.

Mineralogical Composition: Ultramafic vs Felsic Dykes

Ultramafic dykes are primarily composed of minerals such as olivine, pyroxene, and hornblende, rich in magnesium and iron, reflecting their mantle-derived origin. Felsic dykes contain quartz, feldspar (both orthoclase and plagioclase), and muscovite, characterized by higher silica content and lighter mineral components. The contrasting mineralogical compositions reflect their differing magmatic sources and crystallization conditions, with ultramafic dykes representing mafic to ultramafic magmas and felsic dykes deriving from silica-rich magmas.

Formation Processes: Comparing Ultramafic and Felsic Dykes

Ultramafic dykes form from mantle-derived magma rich in magnesium and iron, crystallizing at high temperatures typically above 1200degC, and intrude into the crust during extensional tectonic settings. Felsic dykes crystallize from silica-rich magma, often associated with continental crust melting or crustal differentiation, solidifying at comparatively lower temperatures around 650-800degC. The contrasting formation processes reflect their distinct source materials and thermal regimes, with ultramafic dykes indicating deep mantle origins and felsic dykes representing upper crustal magmatic evolution.

Geochemical Signatures and Analysis

Ultramafic dykes exhibit high concentrations of magnesium oxide (MgO) and iron (Fe) alongside low silica (SiO2) content, reflecting their mantle-derived origins and compatibility with olivine and pyroxene minerals. In contrast, felsic dykes are geochemically enriched in silica (>65% SiO2), alkali metals such as sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+), with elevated concentrations of incompatible trace elements like rubidium (Rb), barium (Ba), and lanthanum (La), indicative of crustal melting processes. Geochemical analysis using major and trace element ratios, such as MgO/FeO, TiO2, and rare earth element (REE) patterns, effectively discriminates ultramafic from felsic dykes and elucidates their petrogenetic pathways.

Textural Differences Between Ultramafic and Felsic Dykes

Ultramafic dykes exhibit coarse-grained textures dominated by olivine and pyroxene minerals, with interlocking crystals indicating slow cooling, while felsic dykes typically present fine to medium-grained textures composed of quartz, feldspar, and mica, reflecting faster cooling rates near Earth's surface. The ultramafic textures often show ophitic and cumulate structures, contrasting with the felsic dykes' more homogenous and equigranular textures. Grain size and mineral assemblage differences in these dykes reveal significant variations in their crystallization environment and magma composition.

Tectonic Settings and Geological Distribution

Ultramafic dykes predominantly occur in rifted continental margins and mantle plume settings where mantle-derived magmas intrude crustal rocks, commonly found in Proterozoic and Archean shields such as the Kaapvaal and Dharwar cratons. Felsic dykes are mostly associated with convergent plate boundaries, especially in continental arc settings, where crustal melting generates silica-rich magmas, with notable occurrences in the Andes and the Sierra Nevada batholith. Ultramafic dykes often exhibit restricted geological distribution linked to mantle tectonics, while felsic dykes demonstrate widespread distribution in orogenic belts and collisional zones globally.

Economic Importance and Applications

Ultramafic dykes are rich in magnesium and iron, often hosting valuable minerals such as chromite and platinum group elements, making them crucial targets for mining operations in the extraction of these economically significant metals. Felsic dykes, composed primarily of quartz and feldspar, may carry rare-earth elements and gemstones, contributing to both industrial applications and jewelry markets. Both dyke types influence regional metallogeny and can guide exploration for associated ore deposits, enhancing their economic importance in mineral resource development.

Summary: Ultramafic Dyke vs Felsic Dyke

Ultramafic dykes are composed primarily of magnesium and iron-rich minerals such as olivine and pyroxene, reflecting their origin from the Earth's mantle, while felsic dykes contain high silica content with minerals like quartz and feldspar, indicative of a crustal source. Ultramafic dykes typically exhibit darker colors and higher density compared to the lighter, less dense felsic dykes. These compositional and textural differences influence their respective geochemical signatures and tectonic implications in igneous petrology.

Ultramafic Dyke Infographic

Felsic Dyke vs Ultramafic Dyke in Geography - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Ultramafic Dyke are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet