Necropolitics vs Cultural hegemony in Culture - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 2, 2025

Cultural hegemony describes how dominant groups in society maintain power by shaping cultural norms, beliefs, and values to align with their own interests. This concept reveals the subtle ways your perception of reality and social practices are influenced by those in control. Explore the rest of the article to understand how cultural hegemony impacts everyday life and societal structures.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Cultural Hegemony Necropolitics
Definition Dominance of a ruling class's worldview shaping societal norms and values Political power controlling life and death, deciding who may live or die
Originator Antonio Gramsci Achille Mbembe
Focus Consent and cultural leadership through ideology Sovereignty exercised through violence and exclusion
Mechanism Media, education, religion reinforcing dominant culture State or authority deploying death and control over populations
Impact Maintains social order by shaping beliefs and behaviors Marginalizes and eliminates groups deemed expendable
Relevance Cultural studies, sociology, political theory Postcolonial studies, critical theory, human rights

Understanding Cultural Hegemony: Foundations and Influence

Cultural hegemony, a concept developed by Antonio Gramsci, refers to the dominant socio-cultural norms and values that shape societal structures and maintain the power of ruling classes through ideological means. It operates by embedding hegemonic beliefs into everyday institutions and media, influencing public perception and consent without direct coercion. Understanding cultural hegemony reveals how power is maintained through cultural dominance, contrasting with necropolitics, which exerts control through life and death decisions in political sovereignty.

Defining Necropolitics: Power Over Life and Death

Necropolitics, a concept developed by Achille Mbembe, explores the exercise of power through the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die, shaping sovereign control beyond traditional political mechanisms. Unlike cultural hegemony, which emphasizes domination through ideological and cultural consensus as theorized by Antonio Gramsci, necropolitics centers on the sovereign's authority to manage life, death, and social death in contexts such as war, colonization, and systemic violence. This framework critically examines how marginalized populations are subjected to conditions that enforce death or reduce life to a state of bare survival, thereby redefining power relations in biopolitical terms.

Historical Roots: Emergence of Hegemony and Necropolitics

Cultural hegemony, rooted in Antonio Gramsci's early 20th-century theories, emerges from the dominant class's control over cultural institutions to maintain social power and ideology. Necropolitics, a concept developed by Achille Mbembe in the early 21st century, traces its origins to colonial and postcolonial contexts where sovereign power dictates who may live and who must die, exposing the violent enforcement of control. Both frameworks historically reveal how power structures manipulate life, death, and consent to sustain dominance in different socio-political eras.

Cultural Hegemony in Modern Societies

Cultural hegemony in modern societies operates through dominant ideologies embedded in media, education, and political institutions that shape public consciousness and maintain social control. This form of power shapes norms and values, reinforcing existing class structures and legitimizing the status quo without overt coercion. Unlike necropolitics, which exerts control through the power to dictate life and death, cultural hegemony subtly governs by influencing collective beliefs and practices.

Necropolitics in Contemporary Governance

Necropolitics in contemporary governance refers to the state's power to dictate who may live and who must die through the control of life and death, often exercised via policies of war, confinement, and systemic violence. This concept, distinct from cultural hegemony which revolves around ideological dominance and consent, exposes the stark mechanisms of sovereignty where marginal populations are subjected to conditions of social and physical death. Understanding necropolitics reveals the ways governments institutionalize exclusion and death as tools of political control in modern societies.

Hegemonic Narratives vs. Politics of Death

Cultural hegemony shapes societal norms by promoting dominant narratives that legitimize power structures and marginalize alternative voices. Necropolitics enacts control through the regulation of life and death, determining which populations are exposed to violence or neglect. The tension between hegemonic narratives and politics of death reveals how dominant ideologies sustain systemic oppression by selectively valuing certain lives over others.

Intersectionality: Where Hegemony Meets Necropolitics

Cultural hegemony orchestrates dominant social norms and power structures that marginalize specific groups, while necropolitics governs the control over life and death, often through systemic violence and exclusion. Intersectionality reveals how overlapping identities, such as race, gender, and class, experience compounded oppression where hegemonic domination enforces necropolitical outcomes. This intersection underscores the critical analysis of power mechanisms that perpetuate social death and annihilation within marginalized communities.

Resistance and Agency against Dominant Powers

Resistance against cultural hegemony manifests through reclaiming marginalized narratives and fostering counter-hegemonic practices that challenge dominant ideologies embedded in societal institutions. In necropolitics, agency emerges by contesting state-sanctioned violence and asserting the right to life within zones of exclusion where sovereign powers dictate death and survival. Both frameworks highlight subaltern struggles to disrupt oppressive power structures by mobilizing alternative forms of identity and collective action.

Global Implications: Cultural Hegemony and Necropolitics Today

Global cultural hegemony shapes international norms through dominant ideological frameworks imposed by powerful states, influencing political and economic systems worldwide. Necropolitics, the power to dictate who may live and who must die, reveals stark inequalities in global health, security, and migration policies, disproportionately affecting marginalized populations. Together, these concepts expose how authority and violence intersect on a global scale, perpetuating systemic oppression and exclusion.

Rethinking Power: Toward Emancipatory Futures

Cultural hegemony, as conceptualized by Antonio Gramsci, reveals how dominant groups maintain power through ideological control, shaping social norms and consent. Necropolitics, introduced by Achille Mbembe, exposes the sovereign power to dictate life and death, highlighting how states exert control through violence and exclusion. Rethinking power involves integrating these frameworks to envision emancipatory futures where domination is dismantled and life-affirming social orders are cultivated.

Cultural hegemony Infographic

Necropolitics vs Cultural hegemony in Culture - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Cultural hegemony are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet