Restrictive Covenant vs Positive Covenant in Law - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 2, 2025

A positive covenant is a legally binding agreement that requires a party to perform specific actions, such as maintaining a property or adhering to certain standards. These covenants ensure obligations are fulfilled to protect interests related to land use or contractual terms. Explore the rest of this article to understand how positive covenants might affect your rights and responsibilities.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Positive Covenant Restrictive Covenant
Definition Legal obligation to perform an action on land Legal obligation to refrain from specific acts on land
Purpose Ensures active duties like maintenance or repairs Limits or restricts land use or behavior
Enforceability Typically enforceable against the original parties; limited binding effect on successors Generally enforceable against successors if registered
Examples Maintain a boundary fence, contribute to road upkeep No building above a certain height, no commercial use of residential land
Common Law vs Equity Enforcement mainly in contract law; limited transferability Equitable relief often available; binding on future owners if properly registered

Introduction to Property Covenants

Positive covenants in property law require landowners to perform specific actions, such as maintaining fences or shared driveways, ensuring upkeep and community standards. Restrictive covenants limit the use or development of property, prohibiting activities like building structures or running businesses to preserve neighborhood character. Understanding these covenants is essential for property buyers and developers to navigate legal obligations and rights attached to land ownership.

Definition of Positive Covenant

A Positive Covenant is a legal obligation requiring a property owner to perform specific actions, such as maintaining a garden or repairing a fence, ensuring ongoing duties tied to the land. In contrast, a Restrictive Covenant limits or prohibits certain uses of the property, like prohibiting commercial activities or building structures above a certain height. Positive Covenants are enforceable primarily between private parties and require explicit agreement, making them less common in freehold property than restrictive covenants.

Definition of Restrictive Covenant

A restrictive covenant is a legal obligation imposed in a deed by the seller upon the buyer of real estate to do or not do something, typically limiting the use or development of the property to protect property values or neighborhood character. Unlike a positive covenant, which requires the property owner to take specific actions, restrictive covenants constrain activities such as building height, land use, or types of structures allowed. These covenants are commonly enforced in residential subdivisions, ensuring compliance through court injunctions or damages.

Key Differences Between Positive and Restrictive Covenants

Positive covenants require property owners to actively perform specific actions, such as maintaining a garden or paying for shared repairs, while restrictive covenants limit certain uses or activities on the property, like prohibiting commercial use or restricting building height. The enforceability of positive covenants is often more challenging since they impose ongoing obligations, whereas restrictive covenants typically bind successors in title and run with the land more easily. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for property developers and homeowners to assess legal responsibilities and land use limitations effectively.

Legal Enforceability of Covenants

Positive covenants require a property owner to perform specific actions, such as maintaining a fence or paying for shared amenities, but these are generally not enforceable against successors in freehold land due to the doctrine of privity of contract. Restrictive covenants impose limitations on land use, like prohibiting commercial activities or building heights, and are usually enforceable against future owners if properly registered and benefiting the land, under property law principles. Legal enforceability depends on factors including covenant registration, the benefit and burden relationship between properties, and compliance with statutory requirements in jurisdictions like England and Wales or U.S. states.

Common Examples of Positive Covenants

Common examples of positive covenants include obligations to maintain shared facilities, such as gardens, driveways, or fences, and requirements to contribute to the repair costs of communal areas in residential complexes. These covenants compel property owners to take specific actions, like ensuring regular upkeep or funding structural maintenance, to preserve the overall value and functionality of the property. Positive covenants differ from restrictive covenants, which typically limit or prohibit certain activities or uses of the property.

Common Examples of Restrictive Covenants

Common examples of restrictive covenants include limitations on property use such as prohibiting commercial activities in residential areas, restrictions on building heights and architectural styles, and bans on subdividing land plots. These covenants help maintain neighborhood character, ensure consistent property values, and prevent disturbances caused by incompatible land uses. Positive covenants differ by requiring ongoing actions or payments, such as maintenance fees or shared facility upkeep, rather than imposing prohibitive restrictions.

Impact of Covenants on Property Value

Positive covenants, which require property owners to perform specific actions such as maintenance or improvements, often enhance property value by ensuring upkeep and community standards. Restrictive covenants limit usage or alterations of property, preserving neighborhood character and potentially increasing desirability but sometimes reducing market flexibility. Both types of covenants influence buyer perceptions, legal obligations, and long-term investment potential, directly impacting overall property valuation.

Modifying or Removing Property Covenants

Modifying or removing a positive covenant, which requires a property owner to take specific actions, often involves negotiation with the benefiting party or obtaining a court order due to its enforceability. Restrictive covenants, limiting property use to certain conditions, can sometimes be discharged or varied by application to the Land Tribunal or under statutory provisions when circumstances change significantly. Both types of covenants require careful legal consideration, as altering them affects property rights and obligations tied to land ownership.

Choosing the Right Covenant for Your Property

Choosing the right covenant for your property involves understanding the distinct purposes of positive and restrictive covenants. Positive covenants require property owners to perform specific actions, such as maintenance or repairs, ensuring ongoing responsibilities are clearly defined. Restrictive covenants limit certain uses or activities on the property, protecting its value and character by preventing unwanted developments or alterations.

Positive Covenant Infographic

Restrictive Covenant vs Positive Covenant in Law - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Positive Covenant are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet