Infrastructure as a Service vs Function as a Service in Technology - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 14, 2025

Function as a Service (FaaS) streamlines cloud computing by allowing developers to deploy individual functions without managing servers, enabling scalable and event-driven applications. This approach reduces operational complexity and optimizes resource usage based on real-time demand. Discover how embracing FaaS can transform Your development process and boost efficiency by exploring the rest of this article.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Function as a Service (FaaS) Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
Definition Serverless compute model executing code in response to events. Virtualized computing resources over the internet.
Management Provider manages servers, scaling, and infrastructure. User manages virtual machines, OS, middleware, and applications.
Scalability Automatic, instant scaling based on demand. Manual or automated scaling with user intervention.
Billing Pay-per-execution, billed by function runtime and resources used. Pay-per-hour or per-resource allocation (CPU, RAM, storage).
Use Case Event-driven applications, microservices, real-time data processing. Full control over virtual machines, custom environments, legacy applications.
Examples AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions. AWS EC2, Microsoft Azure VMs, Google Compute Engine.

Introduction to Function as a Service (FaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)

Function as a Service (FaaS) enables developers to deploy individual functions that automatically scale and execute in response to events, eliminating the need to manage underlying infrastructure. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) provides virtualized computing resources over the internet, allowing users to rent servers, storage, and networking components on a pay-as-you-go basis. FaaS optimizes cost and operational efficiency for event-driven workloads, while IaaS offers full control over virtual machines and environments suitable for broader application hosting.

Defining FaaS: Key Features and Capabilities

Function as a Service (FaaS) enables developers to deploy individual functions or pieces of business logic that automatically scale and execute in response to events, without managing the underlying servers. Key features include event-driven execution, granular scalability, and a pay-per-execution pricing model, optimizing resource utilization and cost efficiency. Unlike Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), which provides virtualized computing resources for broader application deployment and management, FaaS abstracts infrastructure concerns, focusing solely on code execution and rapid development cycles.

Understanding IaaS: Core Components and Advantages

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) provides virtualized computing resources over the internet, including servers, storage, and networking, enabling scalable and flexible IT infrastructure without physical hardware management. Core components of IaaS encompass virtual machines, load balancers, firewalls, and storage systems that support dynamic resource allocation and automated scaling. Advantages of IaaS include cost efficiency, rapid deployment, enhanced disaster recovery, and the ability to customize infrastructure based on workload demands, differentiating it from Function as a Service (FaaS), which abstracts infrastructure further by executing individual functions on demand.

FaaS vs IaaS: Architecture Comparison

Function as a Service (FaaS) offers a serverless architecture where developers deploy discrete functions that automatically scale in response to demand without managing the underlying infrastructure. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) provides virtualized computing resources like virtual machines and storage, requiring users to configure and maintain the operating systems and runtime environments. FaaS emphasizes event-driven execution with fine-grained resource allocation, while IaaS delivers more control over the entire stack but incurs overhead in infrastructure management.

Scalability and Flexibility in FaaS vs. IaaS

Function as a Service (FaaS) offers automatic scalability by dynamically allocating resources based on function execution demand, enabling efficient handling of unpredictable workloads without manual intervention. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) provides scalability through virtual machines and customizable hardware resources, requiring users to manage and configure scaling policies, which offers more control but less instant flexibility. FaaS excels in rapid scaling and flexibility due to its event-driven architecture, while IaaS supports diverse workloads with scalable infrastructure that demands proactive resource management.

Cost Optimization: Pay-as-You-Go Models

Function as a Service (FaaS) offers precise cost optimization by charging only for actual function execution time and resources used, minimizing idle resource expenses. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) typically involves paying for allocated virtual machines or servers regardless of usage, which can lead to higher costs when resources remain underutilized. Pay-as-you-go models in FaaS enable enterprises to scale seamlessly and reduce waste, whereas IaaS may require careful capacity planning to avoid overprovisioning and cost inefficiencies.

Security Considerations for FaaS and IaaS

Function as a Service (FaaS) provides granular, event-driven code execution with inherent isolation, reducing the attack surface through ephemeral containers, but faces challenges in securing event triggers and managing the shared responsibility model. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) offers virtual machines with customizable security configurations, granting full control over operating systems and network settings, yet requires rigorous patch management and intrusion detection to mitigate vulnerabilities. Both models demand robust identity and access management, encryption, and continuous monitoring to ensure data protection and compliance within evolving cloud security frameworks.

Use Cases: When to Choose FaaS or IaaS

Function as a Service (FaaS) is ideal for event-driven applications, microservices, and scenarios requiring automatic scaling with rapid deployment, such as real-time data processing and serverless web applications. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) suits businesses needing full control over virtual machines, storage, and networking, often used for legacy application hosting, enterprise-grade applications, and situations demanding customizable infrastructure. Selecting FaaS enhances agility and cost efficiency for intermittent workloads, whereas IaaS provides robust resources and flexibility for complex, long-running applications.

Challenges and Limitations of FaaS and IaaS

Function as a Service (FaaS) faces challenges including cold start latency, limited execution time, and statelessness, which can hinder performance for long-running or stateful applications. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) struggles with scalability management, cost unpredictability due to idle resources, and the complexity of maintaining virtual machines and network configurations. Both models require careful orchestration to balance flexibility, control, and operational overhead, impacting overall cloud deployment efficiency.

Future Trends in Cloud Service Models

Function as a Service (FaaS) is evolving with serverless architectures enabling event-driven execution and granular scaling, driving innovation in microservices and edge computing. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) continues to mature with enhanced automation, AI-driven resource management, and seamless hybrid cloud integrations, supporting complex enterprise workloads. Future trends highlight increased interoperability, AI-powered optimization, and security enhancements across FaaS and IaaS platforms, accelerating cloud adoption and operational efficiency.

Function as a Service Infographic

Infrastructure as a Service vs Function as a Service in Technology - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Function as a Service are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet