Intragenerational mobility vs Structural mobility in Society - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 14, 2025

Structural mobility refers to the ability of individuals or groups to move within a social hierarchy due to changes in the economic and social structure rather than personal efforts alone. It often results from shifts in industry, technology, or policy that create new opportunities or eliminate old ones, impacting your social and economic status. Explore the rest of the article to understand how structural mobility shapes societies and affects your prospects.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Structural Mobility Intragenerational Mobility
Definition Changes in social status due to shifts in the economy or job market structure. Changes in an individual's social status within their own lifetime.
Cause Economic growth, industrial shifts, labor market changes. Education, career changes, personal achievements.
Scope Impacts large groups or generations. Focuses on single individuals.
Time Frame Long-term, generational shifts. Short to medium term, within one lifetime.
Examples Decline of manufacturing jobs leading to new service economy positions. Individual promotion from clerical work to management.

Introduction to Social Mobility

Structural mobility occurs when shifts in the economy or job market create new opportunities or eliminate old ones, leading to changes in individuals' social status across generations. Intragenerational mobility refers to changes in an individual's social status during their lifetime, typically influenced by personal achievements or setbacks. Social mobility encompasses these types as mechanisms that explain how social status can change due to economic trends or individual efforts.

Defining Structural Mobility

Structural mobility refers to the changes in social status resulting from shifts in the economic or occupational structure of society rather than individual efforts. It occurs when the expansion or contraction of industries creates new job opportunities or eliminates existing ones, impacting large groups simultaneously. Unlike intragenerational mobility, which involves changes in an individual's social position during their lifetime, structural mobility affects entire social classes due to broad societal transformations.

Understanding Intragenerational Mobility

Intragenerational mobility refers to the changes in a person's social status or class within their own lifetime, highlighting individual economic progress or decline. Structural mobility occurs when shifts in the economy or social structure create more opportunities, affecting large groups rather than individuals. Understanding intragenerational mobility emphasizes personal achievements, career changes, education, and income fluctuations, reflecting how an individual adapts to or overcomes social barriers over time.

Key Differences Between Structural and Intragenerational Mobility

Structural mobility involves changes in social status due to shifts in the economy or labor market that create or eliminate job opportunities on a large scale. Intragenerational mobility refers to the changes in an individual's social status within their own lifetime, typically measured by shifts in occupation or income levels. The key difference lies in the source of mobility: structural mobility stems from external economic forces affecting groups, while intragenerational mobility is based on personal career progression or decline.

Factors Influencing Structural Mobility

Structural mobility is influenced by broad economic changes such as industrialization, technological advancements, and shifts in labor market demands, which create or eliminate job opportunities across social classes. In contrast, intragenerational mobility depends more on individual factors like education, skill development, and career changes within a single lifetime. Economic policies, globalization, and demographic trends also play significant roles in shaping structural mobility by altering the overall social and occupational landscape.

Determinants of Intragenerational Mobility

Intragenerational mobility is primarily determined by factors such as education level, occupational skills, economic opportunities, and individual choices, reflecting changes in an individual's social status over their lifetime. Structural mobility, by contrast, results from broad changes in the economy or societal shifts that alter the distribution of jobs and social positions, independent of individual actions. Understanding intragenerational mobility requires analyzing personal achievements, labor market conditions, and social policies that influence opportunities for advancement within a single generation.

Examples of Structural Mobility in Society

Structural mobility occurs when shifts in the economy or social structure create new job opportunities or eliminate existing ones, leading to large-scale movement of people between social classes. For example, the rise of the technology sector has generated numerous high-paying jobs, enabling many individuals to ascend into higher socioeconomic classes, while automation in manufacturing has displaced workers, resulting in downward mobility for some. Changes such as industrialization, globalization, and shifts in labor market demand exemplify structural mobility's impact on society.

Case Studies of Intragenerational Mobility

Intragenerational mobility refers to the changes in social status experienced by an individual within their lifetime, contrasted with structural mobility, which results from shifts in the economy or social structure affecting large groups. Case studies of intragenerational mobility often highlight upward or downward occupational shifts, such as a factory worker advancing to managerial roles or experiencing unemployment due to industrial changes. These case studies demonstrate how education, skill acquisition, and economic fluctuations directly impact an individual's social mobility trajectory independently of broader structural shifts.

Implications for Social Equality and Policy

Structural mobility refers to changes in social status resulting from shifts in the economy or societal organization, while intragenerational mobility involves changes in an individual's social position within their lifetime. Structural mobility can promote social equality by expanding opportunities through economic growth or industrial transformation, influencing policy to support education, labor markets, and economic diversification. Intragenerational mobility highlights the need for policies that enhance individual skills, job training, and social safety nets to reduce inequality and enable upward mobility within a generation.

Conclusion: Comparing the Impact of Mobility Types

Structural mobility results from shifts in the economy that change the distribution of jobs across industries, leading to changes in social status across large groups. Intragenerational mobility refers to changes in an individual's social position within their lifetime, reflecting personal achievements or setbacks. Comparing these, structural mobility often has a broader societal impact by altering the class structure on a large scale, while intragenerational mobility highlights individual agency and life course dynamics in social status changes.

Structural mobility Infographic

Intragenerational mobility vs Structural mobility in Society - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Structural mobility are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet