OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant vs Device Authorization Grant in Technology - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Apr 16, 2025

The Device Authorization Grant is a secure OAuth 2.0 flow designed for devices with limited input capabilities, such as smart TVs or IoT devices, enabling them to obtain user authorization without a browser. This method allows users to authenticate on a separate device by entering a user code, ensuring seamless access to protected resources while maintaining security. Discover how this grant type works and how it can enhance your device's authentication process in the full article.

Table of Comparison

Feature Device Authorization Grant OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant
Purpose Authorize devices without browser input Obtain tokens using user credentials
User Interaction Users authenticate separately via another device Direct username and password submission
Security Level High - no password sharing; uses user codes Lower - exposes user credentials to client
Use Cases Smart TVs, IoT devices, consoles Trusted applications where direct login is feasible
OAuth2 Specification RFC 8628 RFC 6749 (Section 4.3)
Token Acquisition Polls authorization server after user approval Immediate token response upon credentials submission
Client Exposure Client never sees user password Client handles user password directly

Introduction to OAuth2 Grant Types

OAuth2 grant types enable secure access delegation by defining how clients obtain access tokens from authorization servers. The Device Authorization Grant is designed for user devices with limited input capabilities, allowing users to authorize devices through a separate browser on a secondary device. In contrast, the Resource Owner Password Grant requires users to directly provide their credentials to the client, making it less secure and generally discouraged in favor of more user-friendly and secure flows like the Device Authorization Grant.

What is Device Authorization Grant?

Device Authorization Grant is an OAuth 2.0 flow designed for devices with limited input capabilities, allowing users to authorize applications on separate devices through a user-friendly code-based process. It improves security by enabling users to authenticate on a trusted device, avoiding direct credential entry on potentially insecure devices. This grant is ideal for smart TVs, gaming consoles, and IoT devices where traditional authentication methods are impractical.

What is Resource Owner Password Grant?

Resource Owner Password Grant is an OAuth2 authentication flow where the user provides their username and password directly to the client application to obtain an access token. This grant type bypasses the authorization server's interactive consent process, making it suitable for highly trusted applications but posing security risks if misused. Unlike Device Authorization Grant, which is designed for input-constrained devices, Resource Owner Password Grant requires direct handling of user credentials by the client.

Core Differences Between Device Authorization and Password Grant

Device Authorization Grant enables secure user authentication on devices with limited input capabilities by allowing users to authorize via a separate device, enhancing usability and security. OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant requires users to directly provide their credentials to the client, posing higher security risks and is less suitable for public or third-party applications. The core difference lies in credential handling: Device Authorization minimizes exposure by offloading user input to an external device, while Password Grant involves direct credential exchange within the client.

Security Considerations for Each Grant Type

The Device Authorization Grant enhances security by allowing users to authenticate on a separate trusted device, reducing exposure of credentials to the requesting device, making it ideal for devices with limited input capabilities. In contrast, the OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant requires users to provide credentials directly to the client, increasing risks such as credential leakage and phishing, and is discouraged in favor of more secure flows. Overall, the Device Authorization Grant offers improved security posture by minimizing direct handling of user passwords and leveraging user-agent authentication.

Use Cases: When to Use Device Authorization Grant

Device Authorization Grant is ideal for input-constrained devices like smart TVs, gaming consoles, and IoT devices that lack a browser or have limited input capabilities. It enables users to authenticate on a separate device with an accessible user interface, ensuring secure login without sharing credentials directly on the device. This grant is preferred when seamless user experience and enhanced security are required for device-centric authentication scenarios.

Use Cases: When to Use Resource Owner Password Grant

Resource Owner Password Grant is best suited for trusted applications where the client and resource owner share a high degree of trust, such as first-party mobile apps or legacy systems requiring straightforward user authentication. It is used when direct user credentials can be securely handled by the client without exposing them to other services. This grant type should be avoided in third-party or public applications to prevent credential compromise, favoring Device Authorization Grant or other flows instead.

Implementation Workflow Comparison

Device Authorization Grant involves a user entering a code on a secondary device to authorize access, enabling secure authentication on input-constrained devices without directly sharing credentials. OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant requires users to provide their username and password directly to the application, which exchanges these credentials for access tokens, posing higher security risks. The Device Authorization Grant workflow separates user interaction from the client, enhancing security and user experience compared to the direct credential exchange in the Resource Owner Password Grant.

Pros and Cons of Device Authorization Grant

Device Authorization Grant enhances security by allowing users to authorize devices with limited input capabilities without sharing credentials directly, reducing the risk of password exposure. It excels in IoT, smart TVs, and gaming consoles where entering credentials is cumbersome, but requires user interaction on a secondary device, which may introduce usability challenges. Unlike OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant, it avoids handling raw passwords, improving security at the cost of slightly increased complexity in implementation and user flow.

Pros and Cons of Resource Owner Password Grant

Resource Owner Password Grant in OAuth2 offers simplicity and directness by allowing users to provide credentials directly to the client, enabling quick token acquisition without redirection. However, this method poses significant security risks, as it requires users to share their passwords with the client application, increasing the potential for credential leakage and misuse. In contrast, Device Authorization Grant enhances security by using device codes for authentication on separate devices, avoiding direct password handling by the client.

Device Authorization Grant Infographic

OAuth2 Resource Owner Password Grant vs Device Authorization Grant in Technology - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Device Authorization Grant are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet