Voluntary export restraint vs Embargo in Economics - What is The Difference?

Last Updated Feb 14, 2025

An embargo is a government-imposed restriction that prohibits trade or commercial activity with a specific country or entity, often used as a political tool to influence international relations. It can impact the global supply chain, affecting industries and consumers by limiting access to certain goods or markets. Discover how embargoes shape global trade and the consequences they might have on your business or economy throughout this article.

Table of Comparison

Aspect Embargo Voluntary Export Restraint (VER)
Definition Government-imposed ban on trade with a specific country or product. Exporting country agrees to limit exports to a target country voluntarily.
Nature Mandatory and legally enforced trade prohibition. Mutual agreement, often under diplomatic pressure.
Purpose Political leverage, national security, or economic sanctions. Protect domestic industries in importing country from foreign competition.
Impact on Trade Complete halt or severe restriction of trade flows. Controlled reduction in export volumes.
Duration Variable; can be indefinite or time-bound. Usually temporary and subject to renegotiation.
Economic Effect Supply shortages, increased prices, potential retaliation. Stable but reduced supply, price adjustments, less severe than embargo.

Understanding Embargoes: Definition and Purpose

An embargo is a government-imposed restriction that completely prohibits trade with a specific country or the exchange of certain goods, aiming to exert political or economic pressure. It serves as a powerful tool to influence foreign policy, enforce sanctions, or respond to security concerns by halting all imports or exports. Unlike voluntary export restraints, embargoes are mandatory and legally enforceable measures that restrict trade flows to achieve strategic objectives.

What is a Voluntary Export Restraint (VER)?

A Voluntary Export Restraint (VER) is a trade restriction imposed by an exporting country at the request of the importing country, limiting the quantity of goods exported to protect domestic industries. Unlike an embargo, which is a complete ban on trade for political reasons, a VER is a negotiated quota that restrains exports on a voluntary basis. Major examples include the 1980s agreements between Japan and the United States on automobile exports, which aimed to control the influx of Japanese cars into the U.S. market.

Key Differences Between Embargoes and VERs

Embargoes are official government-imposed bans on trade with specific countries, completely prohibiting imports or exports to restrict goods flow. Voluntary export restraints (VERs) are self-imposed limits by exporting countries on the quantity of goods exported to avoid harsher trade barriers. Key differences include that embargoes are unilateral and legally binding government actions, whereas VERs are negotiated agreements that rely on exporter cooperation to manage trade volumes.

Economic Impacts of Embargoes on Global Trade

Economic impacts of embargoes on global trade include significant disruptions in supply chains, leading to increased costs and reduced availability of goods in affected markets. Embargoes often cause retaliatory trade restrictions and decreased investment flows, hindering economic growth for both exporting and importing countries. The distortion in trade patterns can result in long-term damage to international trade relationships and a shift toward alternative trading partners or domestic production.

How VERs Influence Exporting Countries

Voluntary export restraints (VERs) directly limit the quantity of goods exporting countries can sell to a particular market, often resulting in reduced export volumes and potential shifts to alternative markets. Unlike embargoes, which completely prohibit trade, VERs allow exports but impose negotiated caps that can lead to increased prices and altered trade balances for exporting nations. Exporting countries may face decreased revenues and pressure to diversify their markets or product lines due to the constrained export opportunities under VERs.

Political Motivations Behind Embargoes

Embargoes are government-imposed restrictions on trade with specific countries, often driven by political motivations such as sanctions, diplomatic conflicts, or human rights concerns. Voluntary export restraints (VERs) are trade limits agreed upon by exporting countries, typically to avoid harsher trade sanctions or to maintain diplomatic relations. Political motivations behind embargoes include exerting economic pressure to influence foreign policies, punishing regimes for actions deemed unacceptable, and signaling international condemnation.

Case Studies: Embargoes in Recent History

The 2019 U.S. embargo on Huawei exemplifies a targeted restriction to limit technology transfer and protect national security, significantly impacting global supply chains and U.S.-China trade relations. South Africa's embargo against Iran mirrored international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation, demonstrating how embargoes serve geopolitical objectives. These cases highlight embargoes' role in exerting pressure through complete trade bans, contrasting with voluntary export restraints that involve negotiated limits to exports without outright prohibitions.

Case Studies: Successful and Failed VERs

Voluntary Export Restraints (VERs) have produced mixed outcomes, such as the successful 1981 U.S.-Japan VER on automobiles, which helped reduce trade tensions and allowed American automakers to recover. However, the 1985 U.S.-South Korean VER on steel demonstrated failure, resulting in prolonged trade disputes and minimal improvements for domestic producers. In contrast, embargoes like the 1973 OPEC oil embargo sharply constrained supply, causing global economic disarray but achieving geopolitical leverage.

Pros and Cons: Embargoes vs Voluntary Export Restraints

Embargoes impose a complete ban on trade with specific countries, providing strong political leverage and protecting domestic industries but often leading to significant economic losses and retaliation. Voluntary Export Restraints (VERs) limit export quantities through agreements, reducing market disruption and retaliation risks while often resulting in higher prices and reduced product availability for importing countries. Both tools are used to control trade flows, but embargoes are more rigid and punitive, whereas VERs offer a negotiated compromise with mixed impacts on supply chains and consumer welfare.

Choosing the Right Trade Restriction Strategy

Choosing the right trade restriction strategy depends on the specific economic and political goals of a country; an embargo completely bans imports or exports of certain goods to exert maximum pressure or protect domestic industries, often leading to significant diplomatic consequences. Voluntary export restraints (VERs) involve negotiated limits on exports by the exporting country, reducing trade tensions while allowing some level of market access; this approach is often favored to maintain diplomatic relations and avoid harsher trade disputes. Understanding the impact on supply chains, international relations, and compliance with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules is essential when selecting between an embargo and a voluntary export restraint.

Embargo Infographic

Voluntary export restraint vs Embargo in Economics - What is The Difference?


About the author. JK Torgesen is a seasoned author renowned for distilling complex and trending concepts into clear, accessible language for readers of all backgrounds. With years of experience as a writer and educator, Torgesen has developed a reputation for making challenging topics understandable and engaging.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Embargo are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet